Blog Entries
The Bitcoin Psyop | Corbett Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkhUn7nh33Q

Published on 19 Jan 2018

TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/bitcoin...

Yes, the blockchain is truly revolutionary. Yes, bitcoin is Tulipmania 2.0. Yes, cryptocurrency is a nail in the coffin of the bankster parasites. Yes, digital currency is a tool of the totalitarian tyrants. No, these statements are not contradictory. But donít worry if you think they are. Youíre just a victim of "The Bitcoin Psyop."

TRANSCRIPT

This is The Corbett Report.

So whatís the bitcoin psyop? Well, look at a headline like this:

ďFormer Chairman of Federal Reserve to Speak at Blockchain ConferenceĒ

If you immediately think ďAha! I knew it! The Fed is behind this bitcoin nonsense, after all!Ē then you might want to stop and contemplate this headline from two years ago:

ďBen Bernanke: Bitcoin Has ĎSerious ProblemsíĒ

Do you think thereís some kind of contradiction here? Or do you think that Bernanke has ďflip-floppedĒ on the issue? Or do you suspect that Bernanke was always secretly behind bitcoin but couldnít admit it until now?

If so, then you have fallen for an embarrassingly simple trick. That trick is to use the words ďbitcoinĒ and ďblockchainĒ and ďcryptocurrencyĒ and ďdigital currencyĒ interchangeably, as if they are all the same thing. They are not.

Confused? Well, fear not! Our good friends at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) have written a handy-dandy article that explains everything to you in simple, everyday language. Theyíve even illustrated that article with easy-to-understand infographics!

Just kidding. Their unwieldy article on ďCentral Bank CryptocurrenciesĒ is a predictably hot mess of monetary jargon and Venn diagrams that somehow make things look even more complicated than they sound.

Now, to be fair, their proposed new ďtaxonomy of moneyĒ has real explanatory power, and the diagrams that result are genuinely insightful, but it hardly makes for light bedtime reading. So, letís see if we can make it a little easier, shall we?

A blockchain is a cryptographically secured ledger that can be permissionless and decentralized.

The geeks in the crowd will appreciate the fact that the blockchain is a stupendously elegant solution to some incredibly complicated problems in the obscure recesses of arcane subjects like distributed computing and payment processing. But for the non-geeks, perhaps this will suffice: Some of the oldest documents ever discovered have been ledgers of one sort or another. Medical records, legal and business contracts, accounting ledgers; as long as there has been civilization, there has been the need for secure and accurate record-keeping of transactions and events. And since the birth of civilization there has only been one way to keep those records: a system where a recognized central administrator stores, secures and updates that ledger.

Until now, that is. With the advent of the blockchain, an accurate ledger can now be maintained without a single, central point where that information is stored, maintained or updated. Registrars? Notaries? You might as well be talking about farriers and chimney sweeps.

So how does it work? And what does it do?

Mike Maloney, the filmmaker behind the popular ďHidden Secrets of MoneyĒ documentary series, describes it this way:

The system that bitcoin runs on is called ďblockchain.Ē Think of it as a modern version of an old-fashioned bookkeeping ledger, but instead of a handwritten list of entries and calculations, a blockchain is a digital list of entries and calculations. A ďblockĒ is simply a bundle of transactions. Think of a block as a whole page of transaction in the old-fashioned ledger. A blockchain is just a chain of blocks. Itís the same as a whole series of pages in the old-fashioned ledger.

Easy, huh? Hereís how it works: The Bitcoin blockchain actually exists in every one of the millions of computers on the network as exact copies of each other. However, for this example, so that we can zoom in and you can really see just how a blockchain works, Iím going to show it as one giant blockchain in the middle of a small network of computers.

Letís follow a pizza transaction with bitcoin. When the transaction occurs it first appears on the network in a pool of unconfirmed transactions along with thousands of others from all around the world. Millions of different computers from the network then gather some of these transactions and place them in their own blocks. The computers are all creating blocks constantly in the hope that theirs will be the next one added to the official chain.

A new block is added to the chain every ten minutes or so, when one of the computers wins the right to have its block recognized as the next in the chain and is rewarded with a prize of newly created bitcoins. The way a computer wins the prize is by trying to guess the answer to an extremely difficult math problem. In fact, the problem is so difficult that even with millions of computers making guesses billions or even trillions of times per second it still takes roughly 10 minutes to find the answer. Once one of the computers guesses the correct answer and wins, all of the millions of computers on the network that did not win are instructed to throw away all the work they have done, update their ledgers with the block from the winning computer, and start again with a new math problem.

In doing so, the computers use an immense amount of power and cost a literal fortune to run. So why do they do it? Because it can be very profitable. This is where the term ďmining for bitcoinsĒ comes from. Instead of striking gold by mining for precious metals in the wilderness, these computers are hoping to strike bitcoin by mining precious numbers on the blockchain.

SOURCE: From Bitcoin To Hashgraph: The Crypto Revolution Ė Hidden Secrets Of Money Ep 8

But talking about the blockchain is like talking about the printing press. Yes, itís revolutionary. Yes, it will change the course of history. But what, specifically, does it print? Well, whatever you want it to, of course. A papal bull or the Ninety-five Theses, the 9/11 Commission Report or The Road to 9/11, a GMO cookbook or The Anarchist Cookbook, colorful pieces of toilet paper or Federal Reserve notes (but I repeat myself).

So what does the blockchain record? Well, whatever you want it to, of course. It can be used as a tool for creating smart contracts or registering land ownership or creating decentralized cryptocurrencies.

This is where bitcoin comes in.

So whatís bitcoin?

Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency whose transactions are recorded in a public blockchain ledger.

There are three things to note about this description of bitcoin.

Firstly, bitcoin is just one application of the blockchain ledger technology. They are not the same thing. Bitcoin is not blockchain. Blockchain is not bitcoin. Bitcoin uses the blockchain innovation to run an electronic payment system.

Itís important to stress this point. Confusing these terms is a purposeful tactic that a lot of 21st century snake oil salesmen are using to sucker a public that sees the bitcoin bubble and believes this is the next great investment opportunity. This ďbaffle them with BSĒ technique has been ridiculously effective in some cases. In one infamous example, ďThe Long Island Iced Tea CorporationĒ recently rebranded as ďThe Long Blockchain Corporation.Ē They still make iced tea, they just added blockchain to their name, and the market responded: The companyís stocks doubled overnight.

This is the exact phenomenon we saw emerge during the dotcom bubble when any company that added ď.comĒ to their name saw their stock price rise. And it is a sure sign that people are being baffled by techno-speak that they donít understand in the slightest.

Andreas Antanopoulos provides some straightforward advice for separating blockchain from BS:

So letís get started. What exactly is going on here is this: the greatest technological innovation and explosion of innovation since the mobile internet, or maybe even the internet itself. Or is this the greatest load of hype ever arranged around the technology in the history of technology? Both. And in fact thatís a characteristic of advanced technologies.

I often say that where bitcoin and the other open block chains are today is approximately where the internet was in 1992. In terms of technology, in terms of infrastructure deployment, in terms of adoption patterns, this technology is approximately where the internet was in 1992. But the hype around blockchain is exactly where the hype around the internet was in 1998. You know what comes next.

There will be a shakeout. When the waters recede you can tell who on the beach wasnít wearing a swimsuit. They stand there naked. Itís an empty promise this will happen in the blockchain space. There is a lot a lot of bullshit being peddled to VCs, to investors, to initial coin offering buyers, to uneducated investors. Thereís a lot of Ponzi schemes, thereís a lot of pyramid schemes, thereís a lot of empty promises, thereís also a lot of business as usual disguised as innovation. Disguised as disruptive technology.

[Ö]

Now out of that came this fantastic saying: ďblockchain is the technology behind bitcoin,Ē which is incorrect. Blockchain is one of the four foundational technologies behind bitcoin and it canít stand alone, but that hasnít stopped people from trying to sell it. Blockchain is bitcoin with a haircut and a suit that you parade in front of your board. Itís the ability to deliver a sanitized, clean, comfortable version of bitcoin to people who are too terrified of actually disruptive technology.

And so you get into this very strange world where the words no longer mean anything. Can you define ďblockchainĒ for me? I think a few people in this room could probably define blockchain but the real challenge would be can you define blockchain in such a way that I can do search and replace with the word ďdatabaseĒ and still make that sentence work? Because thatís the challenge. If what youíre doing is a database with signatures, itís not interesting, itís boring.

What is the essence of bitcoin? Itís not blockchain. The essence of bitcoin is the ability to operate in a decentralized way without having to trust anyone. The essence of Bitcoin is to be able to use software to authoritatively, independently, without appeal to authority, verify everything yourself. You donít trust the other nodes youíre talking to; you assume theyíre lying. You donít trust the miners. You donít trust the people creating the transactions. You donít trust anything other than the outcome of your own verification and , through that you end up trusting in something more important: the network effect.

Bitcoin introduced the concept of decentralized security through computation and this has not yet sunk in. What bitcoin does is it allows you to replace a security model that is based around concentric circle most of access and control with an institution in the center with a security model that is inside out, open and accessible to everyone. A security model that is based on market forces and game theory. It is the first market-based security model where a series of incentives and punishments ensure that the ultimate result is you can trust the platform itself as a neutral arbiter, that is not controlled by anyone. Without third parties. Without intermediaries. Bitcoin revolutionizes trust.

SOURCE: Blockchain vs. Bullshit: Thoughts on the Future of Money

The second thing to note in our definition of bitcoin is that it is a cryptocurrency. That means it uses cryptographic functions to secure and verify transactions on the network and to control the issuance of new units. Bitcoin conforms to a certain protocol, and that protocol defines the rules by which the bitcoin network operates. You can tweak those rules and create similar-but-separate payment systems, each with its own qualities. These bitcoin-like cryptocurrencies are called altcoins.

Thirdly, bitcoin uses a specific kind of blockchain ledger called a ďpublicĒ or ďpermissionlessĒ blockchain. This means anyone can join the network and contribute to the maintenance of the ledger (ďmining,Ē in the bitcoin parlance). There is another kind of blockchain, called a ďprivateĒ or ďpermissionedĒ blockchain, that requires nodes to be invited to join the network or otherwise given permission to participate in maintaining the ledger.

And as a further level of analysis, it should be noted that all cryptocurrencies are digital currencies, but not all digital currencies are cryptocurrencies. Oh, and then thereís virtual currencies, which are, technically speaking, another thing altogether.

OK, this is starting to get confusing, isnít it? This is about the point where weíd need to bust out the Venn diagrams and start coloring the overlapping parts, right? Well, if youíve followed all of this, good for you. If not, donít sweat it. The point for today is simply to recognize that there are a lot of separate-but-related concepts here, and to talk about them as if they are all just one big monolithic thing is not just unhelpful but purposefully misleading.

So, with all of this in mind, letís look at those Bernanke headlines again:

ďFormer Chairman of Federal Reserve to Speak at Blockchain ConferenceĒ

and

ďBen Bernanke: Bitcoin Has ĎSerious ProblemsíĒ

Are you at least beginning to get a handle on how those headlines are not contradictory? How it could be that a central banker could be interested in blockchain technology but dislike the bitcoin application of that technology?

If not, think of it this way: The same DVD player that can play Century of Enslavement can also play The Federal Reserve and You. The same printing press that can print Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy can also be used to print The Warren Commission Report. The same web browser that can take you to corbettreport.com can also take you to NYTimes.com (and no, Iím not recommending that you go there!).

So, yes, the blockchain could be used to create digital currencies that represent the very vision of a totalitarian tyrantís wildest wet dream. Central banks could use private blockchains to administer national digital currencies that permanently record and track every transaction in the economy. That currency could be distributed through government-issued digital wallets that act as an individual ID and allow the government to track everything you ever purchase back to you personally. It could be used to create the perfect system of panoptic oversight, and the totalitarians could, as sole proprietors of the private blockchain, target anyone they saw as a threat for removal from the economy by simply revoking their wallet.

And, yes, the blockchain could be used to create a digital currency that represent the bankstersí worst nightmare. Free individuals could use a public blockchain to create a cryptocurrency not issued by or subject to any central authority. Or they could use it to raise untaxable cryptofunds for agoristic start-up ventures through unregistered ICOs. Or it could be used to transfer value or property instantaneously across the imaginary lines on the map that define the supposed boundaries of the would-be tyrantsí geographical monopolies without the permission of said tyrants.

Are you starting to get the picture?

A gun can be used by a jackbooted minion of the police state to murder you and your family, or it can be used by you to defend yourself and your family. It is a tool, just like the blockchain, and can be used for good or for ill.

So what Iíd like to equip you with is a set of criteria to understand when you are being presented with something, perhaps to invest or to be employed or to engage in some way, and it calls itself a ďblockchainĒ or a ďdistributed ledgerĒ or one of these other names that are coming out. How can you tell blockchain from bullshit? They both start with a ďB.Ē Whatís the difference? If you can replace the word ďblockchainĒ with ďdatabaseĒ and the brochure reads the samel itís business as usual. Itís not decentralized, itís not borderless, neutral, censorship-resistant, open. It re-establishes trust in intermediaries. Itís just a database and that is not disruptive.

The idea ďweíre going to take this technology and use it to improve the operating margins of centralized institutions of trust so that they can continue business as usual,Ē Iíd say itís abhorrent but thatís a strong word. Itís just boring. Really, really boring. No one got into this in order to make a few billions for a financial services clearing house, and if you did, Iím really sorry; thatís boring. Whatís really exciting is the possibility of fundamentally changing the way we allocate trust on this planet. Opening up the ability to collaborate, transact, engage on a global level with everyone. Simply by means of downloading an application you can become part of a giant platform of trust that doesnít care who you are or where you came from. That doesnít require permission to participate or innovate. Where a 12 year old JavaScript programmer has the same influence and power as JPMorgan Chase. More, in fact, because theyíre doing open source and feeding into a community of collaboration that is creating a tsunami of innovation. Taking this technology and using it to strengthen the same centralized institutions so that they can improve their bottom line is boring. That is not what blockchain is, thatís just a database, and it doesnít change anything.

In fact, there are some rather disturbing possibilities in this model. Letís think about it for a second. The most commonly expressed application for these new distributed ledger technologies is to replace the function of a centralized clearing house with a consortium of n participants where n is 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 known, permissioned, controlled participants, who will assemble transactions and assign them, rather than compete through market forces in a security model like bitcoin. We discard currency as the underlying mechanism for building market based security. We discard proof of work as wasteful because all it allows you to do is decentralize a secure, neutral, censorship-resistant blockchain. And we trust five named parties to sign transactions. At that point, they donít need to assemble these transactions in blocks, they can just sign the individual transactions. They donít need to chain them together, because absent proof of work and a system of currency incentives. rewriting that is easy; thereís no immutability. So itís not a blockchain anymore because thereís no blocks and thereís no chain.

Now thatís at a technical level, but letís look at the more important level. What do you achieve by replacing a clearinghouse with a consortium of players? You know, thereís something unique a clearinghouse does. If you understand the role of a clearinghouse. one of its most important functions is that it is not a participant in the market. It has no skin in the game. The New York Stock Exchange is not an active trader. Thatís not an accident. Thatís called separation of concerns. The clearinghouse is an independent party with oversight that is not a market participant. If you take that party out and replace it with five banks, all of which have skin in the game, how do you run a consensus algorithm when the incentives to cheat, front run, manipulate the market and break the consensus rules (even adversarially against the other four parties) are so high thereís no incentive to keep the consensus rules. All youíre doing is youíre saying ďtrust us, weíre in a consortium.Ē

Trust us? These five banks? Where were you in 2008 where were you when Libor was fixed? Where were you when the gold markets were fixed? Where were you when front running and high-frequency trading was creating these monsters of crony capitalism? Trust us? Hell no!

Removing the clearinghouse and replacing it withÖWhatís the word? Itís not consortiumÖĒCartel!Ē Thatís the word!Öwith a cartel of the same market makers who have manipulated and compromised every market in history, and doing that in a way that closes this from transparency, thatís not a recipe for efficiency, immutability security, transparency. Thatís not a blockchain. Thatís a bullshit. Itís a very profitable bullshit. It requires you to have confidence in the game. A ďcon game,Ē as itís known.

Be careful what you evaluate when you see these technologies. Taking something whose fundamental purpose is to remove trusted intermediaries and create an open, borderless, neutral system and turning it into a tool for a bunch of untrustworthy trusted parties to manipulate markets is going to be a disaster. And theyíre going to do it.

SOURCE: Blockchain vs. Bullshit: Thoughts on the Future of Money

Now letís look once again at the statements that opened this podcast episode.

Is the blockchain revolutionary? Well, since no decentralized, peer-to-peer ledger has ever existed before, yes, it is that rarest of rare things: something new under the sun.

Is bitcoin Tulipmania 2.0? Yes, in the exact same sense that the dotcom bubble of the í90s was Tulipmania 2.0. Just as Pets.com and other ventures that earned (and lost) hundreds of millions of dollars in the blink of an eye were the result of a speculative frenzy, so too are the sudden run-ups and run-downs in bitcoinís price the result of a speculative frenzy. But the bursting of the dotcom bubble wasnít the end of the worldwide web anymore than a future bursting of the bitcoin speculation bubble will be the end of cryptocurrency (or even bitcoin).

Is cryptocurrency a nail in the coffin of the banksters? Yes. Cryptocurrencies can now be (and already are being) used by millions around the world for instantaneous and virtually free international remittances, all without the aid of a bank account. Start ups have raised billions of dollars in capital through ICOs without a VC predator or investment bank underwriter in sight. More broadly, a whole host of banksters and their associated cronies in the third-party middleman parasitic class are already openly contemplating the fact that they have already been made obsolete by the blockchain technology which underlies the cryptocurrency boom. So is the blockchain the one and only silver bullet that will end banking all by itself? Donít be ridiculous. But itís one more arrow for the quiver.

Is digital currency a tool of the totalitarian tyrants? Well, weíve already seen how the BIS is musing about central bank-issued cryptocurrencies, and weíve contemplated how that nightmare scenario of control and surveillance might unfold. It hardly takes a Nostradamus to envision how the forces of centralization are going to push as hard as they can to put the cryptocurrency genie safely back in the bottle of central-bank issued fiat.

Are any of these statements contradictory? Nope. But the bitcoin psyop might have made you think they were. And now you know better.

So, hereís a test of your newfound, nuanced understanding of the intricacies of digital currencies. Can you explain how this headline:

Chinaís Central Bank Has Begun Cautiously Testing a Digital Currency

And this headline:

China Is Shutting Down All of Beijingís Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Are perfectly compatible?

If so, then give yourself a pat on the back. Youíve just seen through the bitcoin psyop.

A version of this podcast first appeared in The Corbett Report Subscriber newsletter in September 2017. To keep up to date with the newsletter, and to support The Corbett Report, please subscribe today.

RSS
Recent Blog Comments
"Summer SOLSTICE Update - WAVES Of Energy Coming In June 21st..."
In: Summer Solstice - Litha - June 21
by: Parsifalrain
"gern geschehen ~SiNeh ūüĆĽ Summer ‚ėÄÔłŹ Solstice ūüĆľ Manifestation..."
In: Der Sonnentanz - Sun Dance-Ritual (deutsch - englisch)
by: Parsifalrain
"RELATED at the BOLE Der Sonnentanz - Sun..."
In: Lisa Thiel - Litha (Summer Solstice Song)
by: SiNeh
"Danke Dir herzlich Parsifal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGlNtJgyA4k ..."
In: Der Sonnentanz - Sun Dance-Ritual (deutsch - englisch)
by: SiNeh
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=My5TGYvJHbA Published on 21 Jun..."
In: ďTrump Creates Crises & Preys on FearĒ: Rep. Jayapal on Policy of Separating Kids from Parents
by: SiNeh
"RELATED at the BOLE BREAKING: Donald Trump To Keep Families..."
In: ďTrump Creates Crises & Preys on FearĒ: Rep. Jayapal on Policy of Separating Kids from Parents
by: SiNeh
"The twelve topics of the meeting: Populism in Europe The..."
In: Bilderberg - Fiat Chrysler is the host in Turin
by: Neto
"Mahalo dear Parsifal I feel..."
In: Pachamama
by: SiNeh
"Aloha Parsifal Thanks for the report. I heard this even here in..."
In: Terrorists are preparing a new poison gas attack
by: SiNeh
"Yea, really, we even don't need such studies because those of us that..."
In: Are IQs Really Dropping? - #NewWorldNextWeek
by: SiNeh
"Young people really ARE getting more stupid: IQs have started..."
In: Are IQs Really Dropping? - #NewWorldNextWeek
by: Parsifalrain
"BILDERBERG 2018: Kissinger & Von der Leyen spotted! Police check..."
In: Bilderberg - Fiat Chrysler is the host in Turin
by: Parsifalrain
"The warhawks as the isdiots and psychpaths they are, are fearmongering because they..."
In: Ulm determined as NATO command center against Russia
by: SiNeh
"1. German LEOPARD 2 vs Russian T14 ARMATA - Military Tank..."
In: Ulm determined as NATO command center against Russia
by: Parsifalrain
"Face To Face CONFRONTING Bilderberg Members https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22cwZtXmxnQ..."
In: Bilderberg - Meet the German Zionist, CEO of one of the biggest Media Houses in Europe
by: SiNeh
"Something Big Is In The Works, Bilderberg 2018 DECODED ..."
In: Bilderberg - Meet the German Zionist, CEO of one of the biggest Media Houses in Europe
by: SiNeh
"I Went To Bilderberg 2018 But All I Got Was This Lousy New..."
In: Bilderberg - Meet the German Zionist, CEO of one of the biggest Media Houses in Europe
by: SiNeh
"RELATED at the BOLE Bilderberg - Fiat Chrysler is the..."
In: Bilderberg - Is Hickenlooper next presidential candidate ?
by: SiNeh
"If only all public servants would be so compassionate. I elevate my hat..."
In: Problems in Science, Volcano Situations Worsen | S0 News Jun.6.2018
by: SiNeh
"After Lava Takes His Kapoho Home, Mayor Speaks (Jun. 5, 2018) ..."
In: Problems in Science, Volcano Situations Worsen | S0 News Jun.6.2018
by: SiNeh
Search Archive

September 2018 (1)
June 2018 (83)
May 2018 (112)
April 2018 (97)
March 2018 (103)
February 2018 (71)
January 2018 (89)
December 2017 (93)
November 2017 (128)
October 2017 (135)
September 2017 (91)
August 2017 (125)
July 2017 (149)
June 2017 (49)

WHO IS ONLINE
Donation / Support

We take BITCOIN too

3GgibGqh4Rr5i6WmGKeQqdisENLJNKeJH4

The B.O.L.E. is completely funded by community, managed and maintained by volunteers. Please consider making a contribution so more stories of awakening and alternative views can be shared!

THANK YOU

Focusing On Real Values

A great way to a new standard.

Gold in small units, also one gram at time

Products for your Wellness

Important: For all products chose at the top of the page the  language (English or German) and currency!

 click HERE to reach all products

TATWellness deliver worldwide.

In Your Service

The BOLE at

Subscribe to basic income for all. A currency by the people for the people, not by central banks. Click either at the picture or the link below.

SiNeh~

MANNABASE

SiNeh~

Live Support