I had really been utterly amazed when I read the message the Russian government has allowed its citizens to carry firearms for 'self-defense'.
This comes from an in Moscow on Tuesday published government's decision.
So far were Russians, who have a gun license allowed to carry their weapons only while hunting, at sporting events or at shooting exercises.
A great act of faith of the Russian government in the citizens.
Parsifal, November 19, 2014
image top: Why carry a gun ? Because a policeman is too heavy.
But, but I thought that this Putin is a very evil dictator and oppressed his people.
This tells us all the time the West-Media and West-Politicians.
How to fit a complete liberalization of the firearms legislation with this picture together, Russia would be an authoritarian dictatorship ?
A total contradiction because an anti-democratic or totalitarian regime would never permit citizens to carry weapons, but rather disarm all of them.
So like right after the national socialists seized power in 1933, as first the Jews and then the other 'enemies of the people' were disarmed or under the flimsy reason 'weapons search' raids and house searches took place.
In general, was prohibited all groups of which the NaZi regime regarded as the opposition the possession of firearms, including stabbing weapons and batons.
This setting that the German government trusts its citizens not, is valid until today because in the international context is the German weapons law one of the strictest.
But in all the so-called Western democracies, citizens are systematically disarmed.
After the Brits were disarmed should now be on the British island even the kitchen knives be banned, well, if the British citizenry like this development ?
In England some years ago, all the weapons were collected and destroyed.
The murder rate with guns increased by 12 %
Now wants the government on the British island even the kitchen knives be banned, well, if the British citizenry like this development ?
The monopoly of force should have only the state and the citizen is supposed to be defenseless, against the illegitimate state and the criminals.
What an illogicality.
Criminals have weapons and always have access to weapons, but innocent people should not have.
Therefore, a tightening of the firearms act and further patronizing of legal gun owners is nonsense.
It just shows the true intent of the authority, to have a defenseless people with which they can do what they want.
Peaceful citizens are allowed to be shot defenseless.
The few accidents and all leap years a school shooting is as an excuse for the disarmament of the whole population.
It's not the weapon's fault, but the person's.
Then but go forbid cars.
According to the WHO more than 1.2 million people around the world are killed by car accidents.
If you compare the dangerousness of weapons and automobiles, one comes to the factor of 2000.
What does this say about the oh-so-democratic Federal Republic of Germany ?
A completely disarmed and thus defenseless people.
The Germans were so utterly brainwashed, they even find this defenselessness still desirable, just as the violation of privacy by the snooping-state would not bother at all.
Up to the Peasant's Wars it was figure of speech in Germany:
Only an armed man is a free man.
That was 500 years ago !
Today, Germany has the strictest (and most inconsistent) gun laws in the world.
It must even fundamental rights be surrendered; constant menace of house-search is possible.
The question then arises, will give us the West-Media a totally false image of Russia ?
We are constantly being lied to ?
It is not exactly the opposite Russia is a democracy, and Germany a dictatorship ?
In many ways, Russia is actually a democracy, because there is the President directly elected by the people.
Putin has much more democratic legitimacy than any other state leader in Europe.
And this for the third time.
In Germany, neither the chancellor nor the president are directly electable.
There was no ballot where it was asked do you want Merkel as chancellor or Gauck as President ?
To power these types only come by party-arrangements, shuffle, machinations and hanky-panky.
Also, the prime ministers of the federal states are not eligible.
How is this supposed to be a democracy ?
Not to speak of the EU as the Command, because there no one can elect the leadership, neither members of the EU Commission, the president of the european council, the president of the european commission.
Who has Herman Van Rompuy elected ?
Who has Jean-Claude Juncker elected ?
These figures were plonked the citizens of the EU just in front.
These not elected and not legitimate figureheads in Europe but have the audacity to constantly pointing the finger towards Russia and have the impudence to refer President Putin as 'Hitler'.
Such as the kingpin of the German criminal politicians, Wolfgang Schäuble, in April 2014 compared Putin with Adolf Hitler and the entry into the Sudetenland by the Wehrmacht in 1938, with the result of the referendum on the Crimea.
For Schäuble, Merkel and all the other anti-democrats is the expression of the unique and overwhelming will of the inhabitants of the Crimea, to separate from the fascist coup regime in Kiev and become again a part of the Russian Federation an 'illegal' annexation by Russia.
How can any referendum be illegal, if the populace is the highest sovereign ?
In Russia, it looks as if in fact the Government and the Parliament put themselves lower than the people and not above as here.
Democracy comes from dêmos: people of the state and kratos: power or rule
Thus 'reign of the people (of a state)'.
Only way to explain is that is newly allowed to the Russian citizens to carry weapons for self-defense.
Something like this is unthinkable in the West.
Here is another exploitation which the dictator Putin burdens the Russians, namely, an income tax of a whopping 13 percent, and even as a Flattax !
A tax rate of 13%, very close to the in all religions and philosophies provided proverbial Tenth.
Yes, the Western portmanteaus of 'democracy' and 'dictatorship' can't keep up and tax their subjects with more than 50 and up to 70 percent after possible deductions.
This is what I call total enslavement and rape of the hard-earned money.
Unleaded 95 cost about 80 Euro-cents a liter in Russia.
It is really, really bad there / Satire Stop.
The fear-mongering against any form of possession of weapons in Germany has led to hysterical conditions.
Young mothers raise their children to believe that weapons are something fundamentally bad.
Each ability to put up a fight - a law of nature - is systematically driven out the children.
Later, the son joins the army, and has to face so-called terrorists in Afghanistan.
Mentally weakened, he is confronted with tribal warriors that have no problem with defending their own rights in their country.
These unspoiled natural people were not weakened in their education, and without hesitation is the head of the wuss from the West separated from the body.
The mother is then allowed to pick up the zinc coffin from the airport as a reward for her political correct education...
'Those who out of love to peace turn their weapons to plowshares be used for the plowing by those who have not'.
Ronald Lee Ermey, known by the role of the Drill Instructor Gunnery Sergeant Hartman in Stanley Kubrick's anti-war movie Full Metal Jacket, makes advertising for the Austrian company Glock, and for the possession of firearms:
It's Official, Russia Has Banned All GMO Products!